Case Within a Case

Ignarski v. Norbut, 271 Ill. App. 3d 522, 648 N.E.2d 285 (1st Dist. 1995)

Posted on Updated on

Ignarski v. Norbut, 271 Ill. App. 3d 522, 648 N.E.2d 285 (1st Dist. 1995)

Bloome v. Wiseman, Shaikewitz, McGivern, Wahl, Flavin & Hesi, P.C., 279 Ill. App. 3d 469, 664 N.E.2d 1125 (5th Dist. 1996)

Posted on Updated on

Bloome v. Wiseman, Shaikewitz, McGivern, Wahl, Flavin & Hesi, P.C., 279 Ill. App. 3d 469, 664 N.E.2d 1125 (5th Dist. 1996) (in legal malpractice case based upon medical malpractice case, client must show underlying judgment would have been collectible; where medical malpractice damages would have been paid over time, legal malpractice damages must be a specific sum; damages are not reduced by attorneys’ fees that would have been incurred)

Ayon ex rel. Ayon v. Balanoff, 308 Ill. App. 3d 900, 721 N.E.2d 719 (1st Dist. 1999)

Posted on Updated on

Ayon ex rel. Ayon v. Balanoff, 308 Ill. App. 3d 900, 721 N.E.2d 719 (1st Dist. 1999) (Requirement of expert declaration in medical malpractice action does not carry forward into legal malpractice action arising out of medical malpractice action)

Adams v. Sussman & Hertzberg, Ltd., 292 Ill. App. 3d 30, 684 N.E.2d 935 (1st Dist. 1997)

Posted on Updated on

Adams v. Sussman & Hertzberg, Ltd., 292 Ill. App. 3d 30, 684 N.E.2d 935 (1st Dist. 1997) (litigation malpractice; plaintiff required to recreate case within a case)